Vol. 1NS (New Series), Issue 30 NS July, 1998


Significantly, five (5) new changes in Ohio law, affect all public and private construction contracts and work. These enactments, under House Bill 71, were signed by Governor Voinovich on 7/1/98, and effective September 29, 1998. These new laws were made to amend Section 153.56 R.C. and to enact Section 4113.62 R.C. to void various types of provisions of construction contracts or subcontracts considered to be against public policy and to establish new requirements and limitations relative to exercising rights under a payment bond for certain public improvements. The five significant changes include:

1. PUBLIC WORK; MILLER ACT; NOTICE OF FURNISHING REQUIRED. Under amended 153.56 R.C., a subcontractor or materials supplier supplying labor or materials that cost more than $30,000.00, who is not in direct privity of contract with the principal contractor for the public improvement, must now serve a Notice of Furnishing upon the principal contractor, within 21 days after the first work or materials supplied to the project. If this contractor fails to comply, he has no claim against the principal contractor’s surety bond. If the Notice of Furnishing is served after the 21 day period, the contractor has a right of recovery only to the amounts owed for labor and work performed and materials furnished, during the 21 days prior to serving the Notice of Furnishing.
Under the new Section 4113.62 R.C., various provisions in construction contracts are declared void as against public policy. These include:

2. WAIVER OF SURETY BOND; RIGHTS, VOID. Any provision in a construction contract that waives rights under a surety bond is void and unenforceable.

3. CONTRACTS; "NO DAMAGE FOR DELAY" clauses void, where delay caused by Owner. Clauses providing "no damages for delay" in contracts between the owner and principal contractor are void, if the delay is one proximately caused by the owner’s act or failure to act.

4. SUBCONTRACTS; "NO DAMAGE FOR DELAY" clauses void, where delay caused by Owner, or Contractor. Similarly, clauses providing "no damages for delay" in subcontract agreements are also void if the delay is the proximate result of the owner’s or (upper tier) contractor’s act or failure to act.

5. MECHANICS’ LIEN RIGHTS; RESTRICTIONS PROHIBITED. Finally, contracts making payment contingent or conditioned upon receipt of payment from any other person or entity (e.g. "pay if paid" or "pay when paid" clauses) may not prohibit filing a claim to protect rights under the Ohio Little Miller Act or Mechanics’ Lien statutes.

With the effective date of these new provisions just ahead, additional care must now be taken to review and revise all existing construction contracts and to implement conformity and consistency with the new Ohio laws.

* * *

Author:  J. NORMAN STARK is an Attorney-at-Law, a Registered Architect, (AIA, NCARB) Registered Landscape Architect, Interior Designer, Planner and Senior Appraiser (ASA), admitted to practice law before the Bar of Ohio, the US District Courts, Ohio and Illinois (Central Dist.), the US Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court. He has had experience in business, Construction, Real Property, Litigation and Construction-Legal Project and Crisis Management.


A Licensed Professional Association

17000 St. Clair Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44110-2535
Tel: (216) 531-5310
Fax: (888) 833-5860



home | consulting | public speaking | law letters | selected publications | background | contact
J. Norman Stark, Attorney. All rights reserved. 2004