In response to many requests. Editor
BREACH OF CONTRACT: A breach of contract occurs when a party to the contract fails to perform a contractual duty.
CONTRACT INTERPRETATION: Specific Controls General Provision: A specific provision in a contract controls over a general provision.
CONTRACT INTERPRETATION: Meaning of Words: “Common words appearing in a written instrument will be given their ordinary meaning unless manifest absurdity results, or unless some other meaning is clearly evidenced from the face or overall contents of the instrument.”
ORAL MODIFICATIONS TO CONTRACT: A party which passively accepts the benefits of an oral modification to a written contract waives the protections provided by a no-oral-modification clause.
PRINCIPAL/AGENT: The law of Ohio provides that a party seeking to hold a principal liable for the acts of an agent who exceeds his authority must show that he had reason to believe that the agent had the authority that the party assumed.
EXTRA WORK: In Hastings v. Columbus (1885), 42 Ohio St. 585, the court held that a contractor could recover for extras in a public improvement project, even though there had been no publication and public bidding for the extras, as required under the statutes in effect at that time, based upon a finding that the extra work was necessary for the contractor to do a good job as part of the public works contract.
LIABILITY OF PRINCIPAL: The law of Ohio provides that a party seeking to hold a principal liable for the acts of an agent who exceeds his authority must show that he had reason to believe that the agent had the authority that the party assumed.
FRAUD: The basic elements necessary to prove fraud are: (1) a material false representation or concealment; (2) knowingly made or concealed; (3) with the intent of misleading another into relying upon it; (4) reliance, with a right to do so, upon the representation or concealment by the party claiming injury; and (5) injury resulting from the reliance.
Fraud does exist, however, when one makes statements of future intentions with no present intent to ever in fact perform them.
UNJUST ENRICHMENT: The doctrine of unjust enrichment is that a person will not be allowed to profit or enrich himself inequitably at another’s expense. As ordinarily defined, the concept of unjust enrichment includes not only loss on one side, but gain on the other, with a relationship of causation between them.
QUANTUM MERUIT: The elements of quantum meruit: (Latin – ” As much as he has deserved”.) A benefit conferred upon another and the circumstances render it unjust to permit the other to retain the benefit without making payment therefor. Example: the claims of a tradesperson for work and services actually performed, but not paid.
“In this world there are two tragedies. One is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it. The last is much the worst.”